Daily Junction.mobi portal

UK Rail Strikes Explained: Why They Keep Happening and Who's to Blame

News · June 30, 2026 · Daily Junction Editorial Team · 8 min

[View image]

Rail strikes have disrupted travel for three years — here's why unions are striking, what they want, and why the dispute won't end.

For over three years, UK rail passengers have endured relentless strikes that have crippled the network, cancelled thousands of trains, and cost the economy an estimated £1 billion. The strikes began in June 2022, when the RMT union walked out over pay, job cuts, and working conditions. Since then, ASLEF (the train drivers' union) and other unions have joined, and there have been over 100 strike days. The dispute shows no sign of ending, and passengers are caught in the middle. Here is everything you need to know about the rail strikes — why they are happening, what the unions want, and who is to blame.

Who Is Striking?

Three main unions are involved:

RMT (Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers)

The RMT represents 40,000 rail workers, including:

• Station staff (ticket office staff, platform staff, customer service)
• Maintenance workers (track, signals, infrastructure)
• Train guards (conductors)

The RMT is the most militant union, led by Mick Lynch, who has become a household name for his combative media appearances.

ASLEF (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen)

ASLEF represents 20,000 train drivers. It is a smaller, more focused union, and its strikes have the biggest impact because trains cannot run without drivers.

ASLEF is led by Mick Whelan.

TSSA (Transport Salaried Staffs' Association)

The TSSA represents 20,000 white-collar rail workers, including managers, supervisors, and administrative staff. It has been less involved in strikes than the RMT and ASLEF.

What Do the Unions Want?

The unions have three main demands:

1. Pay rises

Rail workers have had no pay rise since 2019 (or only small rises below inflation). Inflation reached 11% in 2022 and has remained above 2% since. This means rail workers have suffered a real-terms pay cut of around 20%.

The unions are demanding:

• Pay rises in line with inflation (or at least enough to restore pay to 2019 levels)
• No strings attached (the government and rail companies want to link pay rises to "modernisation" — see below)

Train drivers earn an average of £60,000–£70,000 per year (including overtime), which is well above the UK average salary (£35,000). Critics argue they are well-paid and should not be striking. But unions argue that:

• Drivers have not had a pay rise since 2019, so their real pay has fallen
• The job is skilled, safety-critical, and stressful
• Drivers work unsocial hours (nights, weekends, bank holidays)

2. No job cuts

The government and rail companies want to cut 1,800 ticket office jobs and reduce maintenance staff. They argue that:

• Ticket offices are underused (most people buy tickets online or from machines)
• The railway is overstaffed and inefficient
• Modernisation will save money and improve services

The unions argue that:

• Ticket office staff provide essential help to disabled passengers, tourists, and people who struggle with technology
• Cutting maintenance staff will compromise safety
• Job cuts are a false economy — they will lead to worse services and more delays

3. No driver-only operation (DOO)

Driver-only operation (DOO) means trains run without guards (conductors). The driver operates the doors and monitors the platform using CCTV.

DOO is already used on many routes (London Overground, Thameslink, some Northern and Southern services), but the government wants to extend it to all trains.

The unions argue that:

• DOO is unsafe — guards provide a second pair of eyes and can help in emergencies
• DOO threatens jobs (guards will be made redundant)
• DOO is about cutting costs, not improving safety

The government argues that:

• DOO is safe (it has been used for decades on the London Underground and other railways)
• DOO is more efficient (trains can run more frequently)
• Guards will be redeployed, not made redundant

Why the Strikes Keep Happening

The rail strikes have dragged on for over three years because:

1. The government is the real employer

The UK rail network is fragmented. There are 14 train operating companies (TOCs) that run services (e.g., Avanti West Coast, GWR, Northern), and Network Rail (a government-owned company) that owns the tracks, signals, and stations.

But the government controls the purse strings. During the pandemic, the government took over rail finances and now tells TOCs how much they can spend on pay. This means the unions are effectively negotiating with the government, not the TOCs.

The Conservative government (2010–2024) refused to give in to union demands, arguing that:

• The railway is too expensive and needs to be modernised
• Giving in to strikes would encourage other unions to strike
• Taxpayers should not fund above-inflation pay rises for well-paid workers

The Labour government (elected 2024) has promised to negotiate with unions and end the dispute, but progress has been slow.

2. The unions are divided

The RMT, ASLEF, and TSSA have different demands and different strike strategies. This makes it difficult to reach a deal that satisfies everyone.

For example:

• ASLEF (drivers) accepted a 5% pay rise in 2024, ending their dispute
• RMT (station staff, guards, maintenance workers) rejected the same offer, because it was linked to job cuts and DOO

3. Public opinion is divided

Public opinion on the strikes is split:

• Supporters argue that rail workers deserve a pay rise after years of real-terms cuts, and that the government is using the strikes to break the unions
• Opponents argue that rail workers are well-paid, the strikes are selfish and disruptive, and the unions are holding the country to ransom

Polls show that 40–50% of the public support the strikes, while 30–40% oppose them. Support has fallen over time as the strikes have dragged on.

4. The strikes are effective

Rail strikes are highly effective because:

• Trains cannot run without drivers, so ASLEF strikes shut down the network
• RMT strikes (station staff, guards, maintenance workers) also cause major disruption
• The strikes are timed to cause maximum disruption (e.g., during holidays, major events, peak travel times)

The strikes have cost the economy an estimated £1 billion (in lost productivity, cancelled events, and reduced consumer spending), and they have caused misery for commuters, tourists, and businesses.

But the unions argue that strikes are the only way to force the government to negotiate. Without strikes, they say, the government would ignore them.

The Impact on Passengers

The strikes have caused:

• Thousands of cancelled trains (on strike days, only 20–40% of trains run)
• Overcrowding on the trains that do run
• Disruption to work, education, and healthcare (people miss work, exams, hospital appointments)
• Lost revenue for businesses (shops, restaurants, hotels lose customers)
• Damage to the UK's reputation (tourists avoid the UK because of strike disruption)

Passengers are frustrated and angry, but many also sympathise with the workers. A common sentiment is: "I support the workers, but I wish they would find another way to protest."

The Government's Response

The Conservative government (2010–2024) took a hard line on the strikes:

• Refused to negotiate directly with unions (leaving it to TOCs and Network Rail)
• Introduced minimum service levels legislation (requiring some trains to run during strikes)
• Accused unions of "holding the country to ransom"
• Argued that the railway is too expensive and needs to be modernised

The Labour government (elected 2024) has promised to:

• Negotiate directly with unions
• End the strikes by offering fair pay deals
• Modernise the railway without compulsory redundancies

Some progress has been made:

• ASLEF (drivers) accepted a 5% pay rise in 2024, ending their dispute
• The government has dropped plans to close all ticket offices (after public backlash)

But the RMT dispute continues, because the union is still opposed to job cuts and DOO.

Who Is to Blame?

The blame is shared:

The government

• Refused to negotiate for over two years, prolonging the dispute
• Imposed real-terms pay cuts on rail workers by freezing pay while inflation soared
• Pushed for job cuts and modernisation without consulting workers or passengers

The unions

• Rejected reasonable pay offers (e.g., 5% in 2024, when inflation was 2%)
• Timed strikes to cause maximum disruption, hurting passengers and businesses
• Refused to compromise on DOO and job cuts, even though DOO is already used safely on many routes

The fragmented rail system

• The fragmented structure (14 TOCs, Network Rail, government control) makes negotiations complex and slow
• No one is in charge, so no one can make decisions quickly

Will the Strikes Ever End?

Possibly. The Labour government has promised to end the strikes, and some progress has been made (ASLEF drivers accepted a deal in 2024). But the RMT dispute continues, and it may drag on into 2025 or beyond.

The strikes will only end when:

• The government offers a pay deal that the unions accept
• The unions compromise on job cuts and DOO
• Both sides agree on a plan to modernise the railway without compulsory redundancies

Until then, passengers will continue to suffer.

The Bottom Line