Politics · January 28, 2025 · Sarah Mitchell · 10 min
England's 11 metro mayors now govern over 40% of the population with powers over transport, housing, skills, and economic development. The devolution model has delivered investment and visibility but faces criticism over fragmentation, limited powers, and democratic accountability. As more regions seek deals, the future of English governance is being rewritten.
England's 11 metro mayors now govern combined authorities covering 41% of the population—over 23 million people—with powers over transport, housing, skills, and economic development. The model, introduced in 2016 as part of the Conservative government's "Northern Powerhouse" and devolution agenda, has reshaped English local democracy, creating powerful regional leaders who can challenge Westminster and deliver major infrastructure projects.
But the devolution experiment remains incomplete and contested. Metro mayors have far fewer powers than Scotland's First Minister, Wales's First Minister, or even London's mayor. Their authorities operate under a patchwork of different deals, creating inequality and confusion. Voter turnout averages just 28%, and many residents cannot name their metro mayor. As the government pushes to extend devolution to cover 100% of England by 2030, fundamental questions remain about what devolution is for, who benefits, and whether the model can deliver the economic rebalancing it promises.
A combined authority is a legal body that brings together multiple local councils to govern strategic issues across a city region. For example, the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) covers 10 councils (Manchester, Salford, Bolton, Bury, Oldham, Rochdale, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford, Wigan) with a combined population of 2.9 million.
Each combined authority is led by a metro mayor, directly elected by voters across the entire area for a four-year term. The mayor chairs a cabinet of council leaders from the constituent councils and has executive powers over devolved functions.
The model was inspired by London, which has had a directly elected mayor since 2000 (currently Sadiq Khan). However, London's mayor has significantly more power—including control over the Metropolitan Police, Transport for London, and strategic planning—because London is a unique case with its own legislation.
England's 11 metro mayors (as of January 2025) are:
Three more combined authorities are expected to elect mayors in 2025-26, including Greater Lincolnshire and Norfolk.
The metro mayor model emerged from the 2014 "Northern Powerhouse" agenda, championed by then-Chancellor George Osborne. The idea was to rebalance the UK economy by devolving power and investment to England's major cities outside London, enabling them to compete globally.
The first deal was struck with Greater Manchester in November 2014. In exchange for accepting a directly elected mayor, the region received:
The deal was revolutionary. For the first time since the abolition of metropolitan counties in 1986, a city region had strategic governance and significant powers. Other cities quickly sought similar deals, and by 2017, six metro mayors had been elected.
The model was extended under Theresa May and Boris Johnson, with devolution deals offered to more rural and mixed areas like York & North Yorkshire and the East Midlands. The requirement for an elected mayor remained non-negotiable—the government insisted that devolution required a single accountable leader, not a committee of council leaders.
Metro mayor powers vary significantly depending on their devolution deal, but typically include:
Metro mayors control local transport networks, including buses, trams, cycling infrastructure, and strategic road planning. This is often their most visible power.
However, metro mayors do NOT control national rail services (managed by the Department for Transport) or strategic roads like motorways (managed by National Highways).
Metro mayors have powers over strategic planning and can direct councils to build more housing in their areas. They also control housing investment funds (typically £50-100 million annually) for affordable housing, brownfield regeneration, and infrastructure.
Metro mayors control adult education budgets (£500 million+ annually in large areas), allowing them to tailor training to local employer needs. They also run employment support programmes and apprenticeship schemes.
Metro mayors oversee business support programmes, innovation funding, and inward investment. They act as the public face of their region, lobbying government and attracting employers.
Some metro mayors have influence (not control) over health and policing:
Crucially, metro mayors lack powers over:
This means metro mayors can influence but not control many of the issues that matter most to residents, such as hospital waiting times, school quality, and benefit levels.
Metro mayors control significant budgets—Greater Manchester oversees £6 billion annually—but most of this is passported funding from central government with strict conditions. Mayors have limited discretion over how it is spent.
Combined authorities receive funding from:
Critically, metro mayors cannot raise taxes. Unlike London's mayor (who can levy a precept on council tax) or the Scottish and Welsh governments (which can vary income tax), metro mayors rely entirely on central government grants and council contributions. This limits their autonomy and makes them vulnerable to funding cuts.
Metro mayors have delivered tangible successes:
However, controversies abound: